[Servercert-wg] Proposal to Incorporate Mozilla's CRL Revocation Reason Code Requirements into the BRs

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)]

Hi Ben,

I believe the proposal, as written, causes confusion in regards to 
4.9.1.1. Some of the reasons described in your proposal are already 
mentioned in 4.9.1.1. Perhaps we should work some more to "unify" the 
two sections.

My proposal would be to update 4.9.1.1 and include the expected 
CRLReason after each case.


Thoughts?
Dimitris.

On 6/9/2022 8:13 μ.μ., Ben Wilson via Servercert-wg wrote:
> All,
> I'm looking for one more endorser.
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:40 PM Ben Wilson via Servercert-wg 
> <servercert-wg at cabforum.org> wrote:
>
>     All,
>
>     I have created a proposal in Github to incorporate Mozilla's CRL
>     Revocation Reason Code requirements into the Baseline Requirements.
>
>     See https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/377
>
>     https://github.com/BenWilson-Mozilla/servercert/commit/52a480803beff1f96d61c4b6d76570ac7adff4d5
>
>     I'm looking for comments, suggestions, and two endorsers.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Ben
>     _______________________________________________
>     Servercert-wg mailing list
>     Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
>     https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20220907/a098b9ef/attachment.html>