[Servercert-wg] Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 52, Issue 48

[Peter Miškovič]

Disig votes "YES" on SC-58: require distributionPoint in sharded CRLs.

Regards
Peter Miskovic

-----Original Message-----
From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of servercert-wg-request at cabforum.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 5:36 PM
To: servercert-wg at cabforum.org
Subject: Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 52, Issue 48

Send Servercert-wg mailing list submissions to
	servercert-wg at cabforum.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	servercert-wg-request at cabforum.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	servercert-wg-owner at cabforum.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Servercert-wg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Voting period begins: SC-58: require	distributionPoint in
      sharded CRLs (Aaron Gable)
   


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:15:16 -0700
From: Aaron Gable <aaron at letsencrypt.org>
To: "CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List"
	<servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting period begins: SC-58: require
	distributionPoint in sharded CRLs
Message-ID:
	<CAEmnErfU0J4xLrdYH3Qji7MhpU7QgHsAmh_Q-mwFsD-DqrfBJQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Purpose of Ballot

Recently, several conversations around the necessity of the distributionPoint field (and its containing Issuing Distribution Point
extension) in sharded CRLs have come to the conclusion that, although the distributionPoint field serves an important purpose in defending against substitution attacks, RFC 5280's language does not actually require its presence.

This ballot augments the Baseline Requirements' CRL Profile to ensure that all sharded CRLs contain the distributionPoint field.


The following motion has been proposed by Aaron Gable of ISRG / Let's Encrypt, and endorsed by Clint Wilson of Apple, Corey Bonnell of DigiCert, and Dmitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.
Motion Begins

This ballot modifies the ?Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates? (?Baseline Requirements?), based on Version 1.8.4.


MODIFY the Baseline Requirements as specified in the following Redline:

https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/bbca71465ed8a8a76383086039f52c750009286a..348756d64e863c19bcab404671abeeec985d6041
Motion Ends

This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:


Discussion (Completed)

Start time: 2022-10-22 00:00:00 UTC

End time: Not before 2022-10-29 00:00:00 UTC


Vote for approval (7 days)

Start time: 2022-10-31 16:00:00 UTC

End time: 2022-11-07 16:00:00 UTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20221031/6bae7726/attachment-0001.html>

> _______________________________________________
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20221031/38a7ccea/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg


------------------------------

End of Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 52, Issue 48
*********************************************