[Servercert-wg] Initial Vote Results on Ballot SC22: Reduce Certificate Lifetimes (v2)

[Doug Beattie]

Ryan,

 

You’re totally right, I mixed up the months.  Regardless, the public blog is inconsistent with their current view and Jeremy/Tim might consider amending it.

 

 

 

 

From: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:06 AM
To: Doug Beattie via Servercert-wg <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Initial Vote Results on Ballot SC22: Reduce Certificate Lifetimes (v2)

 

Doug:

Could you clarify what you mean "day after"? Tim posted that on August 12, well before Jeremy's post. Did you perhaps confuse August with September, since Jeremy's message was sent September 11, but the blog post was August 12?

 

We discussed this blog post August 19, at https://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2019-August/000901.html , which is well before Jeremy's update on August 27, https://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2019-August/000984.html , or the subsequent post here.

 

 

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:06 AM Doug Beattie via Servercert-wg <servercert-wg at cabforum.org <mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> > wrote:

Jeremy: This email is interesting because the day after you sent this, your company posted a blog that said “DigiCert has no choice but to oppose these changes.”

 

https://www.digicert.com/blog/how-reduced-tls-ssl-certificate-lifetimes-to-one-year-would-affect-you/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20190916/b9b0eb68/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5701 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20190916/b9b0eb68/attachment-0001.p7s>