[Servercert-wg] CAA RFC8659 update

[Tim Hollebeek]

Yeah, I reviewed RFC8659, and I agree.  All of the changes are clarifications 
and improvements.



-Tim



From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha at letsencrypt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 4:59 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>; CA/B Forum Server Certificate 
WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Cc: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>; Tomas Gustavsson 
<tomas.gustavsson at primekey.com>
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] CAA RFC8659 update



The differences are in Section 7: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8659#section-7. The only significant 
non-editorial change (besides the algorithm) was this:

>   This document clarifies the ABNF grammar for the issue and issuewild
>   tags and resolves some inconsistencies with the document text.  In
>   particular, it specifies that parameters are separated with
>   semicolons.  It also allows hyphens in Property Tags.



In  my opinion, this doesn't require a phase-in period. My goal in drafting 
this document was that it would be a drop-in document that codifies current 
practice and incorporates the errata.

I'll send out a proposed ballot soon.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20191126/865aed51/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20191126/865aed51/attachment.p7s>