[Servercert-wg] Voting Begins: SC13 version 5: CAA Contact Property and Associated E-mail Validation Methods (Kamu SM- Erhan TURAN)

Tue Dec 18 03:57:52 MST 2018

Kamu SM votes YES on Ballot SC13.

-- 

-- 
*Erhan TURAN*
Lead e-Signature Tech. Expert
BİLGEM/KamuSM
TÜBİTAK BİLGEM
06200 Yenimahalle, ANKARA
T +90 262 648 1818 - 8542
F +90 262 648 1800
www.bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr
erhan.turan at tubitak.gov.tr
................................................................

<http://bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr>

Sorumluluk Reddi <http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sorumlulukreddi>

18.12.2018 03:19 tarihinde Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg yazdı:
>
> DigiCert votes YES on Ballot SC13.
>
> -Tim
>
> *From:* Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of *Tim 
> Hollebeek via Public
> *Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 6:56 PM
> *To:* servercert-wg at cabforum.org; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion 
> List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [cabfpub] Voting Begins: SC13 version 5: CAA Contact 
> Property and Associated E-mail Validation Methods
>
> Ballot SC13: CAA Contact Property and Associated E-mail Validation Methods
>
> Purpose of Ballot: Increasingly, contact information is not available 
> in WHOIS due to concerns about potential GDPR violations. This ballot 
> specifies a method by which domain holders can publish their contact 
> information via DNS, and how CAs can use that information for 
> validating domain control.
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert 
> and endorsed by Bruce Morton of Entrust and Doug Beattie of GlobalSign.
>
> --- MOTION BEGINS ---
>
> This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and 
> Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates” as follows, based on 
> Version 1.6.0:
>
> Add the following definitions to section 1.6.1:
>
> DNS CAA Email Contact: The email address defined in section B.1.2.
>
> DNS TXT Record Email Contact: The email address defined in section B.2.2.
>
> Add Section 3.2.2.4.13: Email to DNS CAA Contact
>
> Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by sending a Random 
> Value via email and then receiving a confirming response utilizing the 
> Random Value. The Random Value MUST be sent to a DNS CAA Email 
> Contact.  The relevant CAA Resource Record Set MUST be found using the 
> search algorithm defined in RFC 6844 Section 4, as amended by Errata 
> 5065 (Appendix A).
>
> Each email MAY confirm control of multiple FQDNs, provided that each 
> email address is a DNS CAA Email Contact for each Authorization Domain 
> Name being validated.  The same email MAY be sent to multiple 
> recipients as long as all recipients are DNS CAA Email Contacts for 
> each Authorization Domain Name being validated.
>
> The Random Value SHALL be unique in each email. The email MAY be 
> re-sent in its entirety, including the re-use of the Random Value, 
> provided that its entire contents and recipient(s) SHALL remain 
> unchanged. The Random Value SHALL remain valid for use in a confirming 
> response for no more than 30 days from its creation. The CPS MAY 
> specify a shorter validity period for Random Values.
>
> Note: Once the FQDN has been validated using this method, the CA MAY 
> also issue Certificates for other FQDNs that end with all the labels 
> of the validated FQDN. This method is suitable for validating Wildcard 
> Domain Names.
>
> Add Section 3.2.2.4.14: Email to DNS TXT Contact
>
> Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by sending a Random 
> Value via email and then receiving a confirming response utilizing the 
> Random Value. The Random Value MUST be sent to a DNS TXT Record Email 
> Contact for the Authorization Domain Name selected to validate the FQDN.
>
> Each email MAY confirm control of multiple FQDNs, provided that each 
> email address is DNS TXT Record Email Contact for each Authorization 
> Domain Name being validated.  The same email MAY be sent to multiple 
> recipients as long as all recipients are DNS TXT Record Email Contacts 
> for each Authorization Domain Name being validated.
>
> The Random Value SHALL be unique in each email. The email MAY be 
> re-sent in its entirety, including the re-use of the Random Value, 
> provided that its entire contents and recipient(s) SHALL remain 
> unchanged. The Random Value SHALL remain valid for use in a confirming 
> response for no more than 30 days from its creation. The CPS MAY 
> specify a shorter validity period for Random Values.
>
> Note: Once the FQDN has been validated using this method, the CA MAY 
> also issue Certificates for other FQDNs that end with all the labels 
> of the validated FQDN. This method is suitable for validating Wildcard 
> Domain Names.
>
> Add Appendix B: DNS Contact Properties
>
> These methods allow domain owners to publish contact information in 
> DNS for the purpose of validating domain control.
>
> B.1. CAA Methods
>
> B.1.1. CAA contactemail Property
>
> SYNTAX: contactemail <rfc6532emailaddress>
>
> The CAA contactemail property takes an email address as its 
> parameter.  The entire parameter value MUST be a valid email address 
> as defined in RFC 6532 section 3.2, with no additional padding or 
> structure, or it cannot be used.
>
> The following is an example where the holder of the domain specified 
> the contact property using an email address.
>
> $ORIGIN example.com.
>
> CAA 0 contactemail "domainowner at example.com 
> <mailto:domainowner at example.com>"
>
> The contactemail property MAY be critical, if the domain owner does 
> not want CAs who do not understand it to issue certificates for the 
> domain.
>
> B.2. DNS TXT Methods
>
> B.2.1. DNS TXT Record Email Contact
>
> The DNS TXT record MUST be placed on the "_validation-contactemail" 
> subdomain of the domain being validated.  The entire RDATA value of 
> this TXT record MUST be a valid email address as defined in RFC 6532 
> section 3.2, with no additional padding or structure, or it cannot be 
> used.
>
> --- MOTION ENDS ---
>
> *** WARNING ***: USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.  THE REDLINE BELOW IS NOT THE 
> OFFICIAL VERSION OF THE CHANGES (CABF Bylaws, Section 2.4(a)):
>
> A comparison of the changes can be found at: 
> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/Ballot-SC4---CAA-CONTACT-email?diff=unified&expand=1
>
> The changes between version 5 and version 4 are here:
>
> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/92dd4a3a9afa38e9abf6765eb19e27508663ae61
>
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
>
> Discussion (7+ days)
>
> Start Time: 2018-12-10 17:30 Eastern
>
> End Time: Not before 2018-12-17 17:30 Eastern
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> Start Time: 2018-12-17 19:00 Eastern
>
> End Time: 2018-12-24 19:00 Eastern
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
> http://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Sorumluluk Reddi

Bu e-posta mesaji ve onunla iletilen tum ekler gonderildigi kisi ya da kuruma ozel olup, gizli imtiyazli, ozel bilgiler icerebilecegi gibi gizlilik yukumlulugu de tasiyor olabilir. Bu mesajda ve ekindeki dosyalarda bulunan tum fikir ve gorusler sadece adres yazarina ait olup, TUBITAK / Kamu SM?nin resmi gorusunu yansitmaz. TUBITAK / Kamu SM bu e-posta icerigindeki bilgilerin kullanilmasi nedeniyle hic kimseye karsi sorumlu tutulamaz. Mesajin yetkili alicisi veya alicisina iletmekten sorumlu kisi degilseniz, mesaj icerigini ya da eklerini kullanmayiniz, kopyalamayiniz, yaymayiniz, baska kisilere yonlendirmeyiniz ve mesaji gonderen kisiyi derhal e-posta yoluyla haberdar ederek bu mesaji ve eklerini herhangi bir kopyasini muhafaza etmeksizin siliniz. Kurumumuz size, mesajin ve bilgilerinin degisiklige ugramamasi, butunlugunun ve gizliligin korunmasi konusunda garanti vermemekte olup, e-posta icerigine yetkisiz olarak yapilan mudahale, virus icermesi ve/veya bilgisayar sisteminize verebilecegi herhangi bir zarardan da sorumlu degildir. 

******************************************
Disclaimer

This e-mail message, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, private information as well as the exemption from disclosure. The information and views set out in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of TUBITAK / Kamu SM. TUBITAK / Kamu SM shall have no liability to any person with regard to the use of the information contained in this message. If you are not the intended addressee(s) or responsible person to inform the addressee(s), you are hereby notified that; any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message and attached files is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. TUBITAK / Kamu SM do not warrant for the accuracy, completeness of the contents of this email and/or the preservation of confidentiality, and shall not be liable for the unauthorized changes made to this message, viruses and/or any damages caused in any way to your computer system.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20181218/0ff5e3c0/attachment-0001.html>