[cabfpub] Bergamo F2F Agenda Item

[Arno Fiedler]

Hello Dimitris,
the GLEIF has developed the concept of a "Verifiable Legal Identifier", the  qvLEI are issued by a trusted network of "qualified" vLEI Issuers.
That seems to be an interesting and important new topic in the field of organizational identities/OV based on LEI
We can ask the GLEIF CEO Stepan Worl for a lecture, let me know if I should ask him (like in 2017)
Best regards
Arno

Von: Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> Im Auftrag von Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 17:28
An: Ben Wilson <bwilson at mozilla.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Betreff: Re: [cabfpub] Bergamo F2F Agenda Item


On 14/5/2024 6:08 μ.μ., Ben Wilson wrote:
Hi Dimitris,
There appears to be an open slot on the F2F agenda - Wed. May 29th at 9:05 a.m.  I was thinking we could use that time to discuss revocation timelines and balancing the security provided by revocation with the security/stability needed to support critical infrastructure. In other words, we could discuss BR section 4.9.1 and  concerns about disruption of global/national operations in banking/finance, transportation, government, telecommunications, healthcare, and other key areas where certificate revocation might cause key systems to fail.
Should I put this topic in that open slot on the wiki?
Thanks,
Ben

Hi Ben,

I think that would be great. I assume you will be leading this session.

I think it's a great opportunity for CAs with past experience on delayed revocations to share some insight about specific challenges in the sectors you listed, and possibly add some that are missing.

FYI, public evidence for delayed revocation incidents (open and closed, based on specific tags) is available in this link<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?f1=OP&f4=CP&v2=ca-compliance&f2=status_whiteboard&o2=allwordssubstr&component=CA%20Certificate%20Compliance&query_format=advanced&list_id=17029100&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&v3=delayed-revocation%20leaf-revocation-delay&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=DUPLICATE&resolution=WORKSFORME&o3=anywordssubstr&f3=status_whiteboard>.

Although you mentioned that this affects the BR section 4.9.1, this topic affects all Working Groups because all the WG BRs have a section 4.9.1 that is pretty much similar with the TLS BRs. With that said, I would like to ask if Members have any objections for discussing this topic as part of the Forum plenary.


Thank you,
Dimitris
CA/B Forum Chair
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20240516/923ffe68/attachment.html>