[cabfpub] Code Signing WG Charter update

[Martijn Katerbarg]

Thanks Tim. Bruce also offered during the CS call, so it looks like we’re covered from multiple angles! 

If anyone else has comments on this pre-ballot, please let me know. If nothing else, I will start a discussion period once FORUM-19 has gone into voting. 

Regards,

Martijn 

From: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
Date: Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 20:40
To: Martijn Katerbarg <martijn.katerbarg at sectigo.com>, CABforum1 <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: RE: Code Signing WG Charter update 

I’ll endorse this. 

-Tim 

From: Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Martijn Katerbarg via Public
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 4:33 AM
To: CABforum1 <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: [cabfpub] Code Signing WG Charter update 



Sending this as a fresh reminder, as I have not seen any further comments.

I’m also still looking for 1 additional endorser to turn this into a ballot.

Regards,

Martijn 

From: Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org>> on behalf of Martijn Katerbarg via Public <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Date: Thursday, 26 October 2023 at 17:35
To: public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org> <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Subject: [cabfpub] Code Signing WG Charter update 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 


Hi all, 

As discussed during the Forum call today, there is a proposal to update the Code Signing WG Charter. 

The draft is available at https://github.com/cabforum/forum/pull/40 <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fforum%2Fpull%2F40&data=05%7C01%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7C84e0daaff1394244f1df08dbd0a6d62f%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638333187215400303%7> 

This update aims to: 


1. Bump the Charter version 
2. Add a limited scope for including timestamp certificates 
3. Remove the version reference of the bylaws that we follow 
4. During a ballot, count only members that are in a voting class, disregarding associate members and interested parties 
5. Align Quorum definition as half the average, as the Bylaws have it set. 

Comments (and Endorsers) are welcome! 

Regards,

Martijn 








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20231117/fbf1629f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 8254 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20231117/fbf1629f/attachment-0001.bin>