[cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group
chris at ssl.com
Thu Mar 7 17:02:29 UTC 2019
SSL.com votes YES on Ballot FORUM-8.
On 2/16/2019 6:53 PM, Ben Wilson via Public wrote:
> *Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate
> Working Group*
> *Purpose of Ballot*
> It is proposed that the Forum establish a working group to adopt and
> maintain a policy, framework, and set of standards related to the
> issuance and management of code signing certificates by a third-party
> Certificate Issuer, rather than by the platform supplier (i.e.
> Certificate Consumer) itself. The work would be based on the Forum’s
> prior adoption of the EV Code Signing Guidelines, version 1.4, (Ballot
> 172; 5 July 2016), and additional work by Forum members who expressly
> agreed to operate pursuant to the Forum’s IPR Policy, between 2013 and
> 2015, which resulted in a failed proposal to adopt a set of baseline
> requirements for the issuance and management of code signing
> It is proposed by Ben Wilson of DigiCert and endorsed by Mike Reilly
> of Microsoft and Bruce Morton of Entrust Datacard that the Forum
> charter a working group to operate in accordance with the Scope and
> other provisions that follow. This Charter will take effect upon
> approval of the CAB Forum by ballot conducted in accordance with Bylaw
> *— BALLOT BEGINS —*
> *Code Signing Certificate Working Group Charter*
> This introduction provides general information and context with an
> intent to assist the interpretation of this Charter.
> A code signing certificate contains the public key corresponding to a
> private key that is used by a person or organization to digitally sign
> data—such data usually containing instructions (i.e. “code”) for
> hardware to perform certain tasks. A code signing certificate can be
> identified by the existence of an Extended Key Usage (EKU) Object
> Identifier (OID) of 22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199.3.
> The objective of a code signing certificate is to provide a
> cryptographic way to identify the source of code. There are a variety
> of functional models and use cases whereby a code signing certificate
> is issued by a Certificate Issuer to a Subscriber for use in signing
> code that will run on a particular computing platform or group of
> platforms. (Each platform supplier determines how a chain between a
> trusted root CA certificate and the code signing certificate will be
> created and verified.)
> The primary use case under consideration for the working group is a
> model whereby the platform supplier accepts code signing certificates
> issued by a third-party Certificate Issuer. A common example of this
> model is Microsoft’s Authenticode, although others exist.
> Other functional models include those which allow developers to
> self-sign code and those in which the platform supplier manages the
> code signing or certificate issuance process, and these models are
> expressly excluded from the working group’s mandate. Common examples
> of these models that are expressly excluded from the scope of
> guidelines to be promulgated by the working group are Apple’s
> Developer ID program and Google’s Android.
> *Chartering of the Code Signing Certificate Working Group*
> A Chartered Working Group (“CWG”) is created to perform the activities
> as specified in this Charter, subject to the terms and conditions of
> the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
> Policy, as such documents may change from time to time. This charter
> for the Code Signing Certificate Working Group has been created
> according to CAB Forum Bylaw 5.3.1. In the event of a conflict between
> this Charter and any provision in either the Bylaws or the IPR Policy,
> the provision in the Bylaws or IPR Policy SHALL take precedence. The
> definitions found in the Forum’s Bylaws SHALL apply to capitalized
> terms in this Charter.
> 1. *Scope*
> The authorized scope of the CWG SHALL be to discuss, adopt, and
> maintain policies, frameworks, and sets of standards related to the
> issuance and management of code signing certificates by third-party
> Certificate Issuers under a publicly trusted root (and not code
> signing certificates issued under a private root CA), limited as follows:
> 1. EV Code Signing Guidelines, v. 1.4 and subsequent versions
> 2. Version 1.0 Draft of November 19, 2015, Baseline Requirements for
> the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Code Signing
> Certificates (subject to the CWG making a written finding that the
> provenance of such document is sufficiently covered by the Forum’s
> IPR Policy)
> 3. Verification requirements for issuance/renewal of code signing
> 4. Subscriber protection of private keys, including keys stored in
> the cloud
> 5. Certificate issuance and revocation
> 6. Requirements/controls on use of code signing certificates
> 7. Mechanisms to engage with AV vendors, researchers, and others
> regarding signed malware
> 8. Certificate profiles for code signing certificates and Issuing CA
> certificates (including the appropriateness of extensions and when
> those extensions should be present)
> 9. Certificate issuance and revocation
> 10. CA operational practices, physical/logical security, etc.
> The CWG SHALL exercise caution to ensure that its work product does
> not impede the issuance of other EKU types.
> 2. *Out of Scope*
> The CWG SHALL NOT develop guidelines, standards, or requirements
> applicable to:
> 1. Self-signed code;
> 2. Platform suppliers / Certificate Consumers;
> 3. Certificates issued under a root certificate that is not publicly
> trusted, even though they are managed by Certificate Issuers or
> other third-party service providers; or
> 4. The code signing or certificate issuance process when managed by a
> platform supplier / Certificate Consumer.
> 3. *Charter Expiration*
> The CWG is chartered until it is dissolved as specified in Bylaw 5.3.2(c).
> 4. *Personnel and Participation*
> 1. *Selection of Officers ***
> Dean Coclin will act as chair of the CWG until the first Working Group
> Teleconference, at which time the group will select a chair and
> vice-chair. The chair and vice-chair will serve until October 31,
> 2020, or until they are replaced, resign, or are otherwise
> disqualified. Thereafter, elections SHALL be held for chair and vice
> chair every two years in coordination with the Forum’s election
> process and in conjunction with its election cycle. Voting SHALL occur
> in accordance with Bylaw 4.1(c).
> 2. *Eligibility to Participate, Suspension, and Termination of
> Membership in CWG*
> The CWG SHALL consist of two classes of voting members, Certificate
> Issuers and Certificate Consumers meeting the eligibility criteria below:
> 1. A Certificate Issuer eligible for voting membership in the CWG
> must have a current WebTrust for CAs or ETSI EN 319 411-1/EN 319
> 411-2 audit report prepared by a properly-qualified auditor and
> actively issue code signing certificates that are accepted for use
> in computing platforms in which the platform supplier accepts code
> signing certificates issued by such Certificate Issuer.
> 2. A Certificate Consumer (i.e. a platform supplier) eligible for
> voting membership in the CWG must produce a computing platform
> that accepts code signing certificates issued by third-party
> Certificate Issuers who meet criteria set by such Certificate
> Forum Members seeking to participate in the CWG MUST declare their
> intent to participate in accordance with subsection (c) below and
> provide the CWG Chair with evidence that they meet the criteria set
> forth above.
> An Applicant not already a member of the Forum SHALL provide the
> information required by Bylaw 2.1(b). Such Applicant SHALL become a
> Member once the CWG has determined by consensus among the Members
> during a CWG Meeting or Teleconference that the Applicant meets all of
> the requirements above or, upon the request of any Member of the CWG,
> by a Ballot among Members of the CWG. Acceptance by consensus shall be
> determined or a Ballot of the Members shall be held as soon as the
> Applicant indicates that it has presented all information required
> above and has responded to all follow-up questions from the CWG and
> the Member has complied with the requirements of Bylaw 5.5.
> Certificate Issuer applicants that are not actively issuing code
> signing certificates but otherwise meet these membership criteria MAY
> request to the CWG that they be granted an invitation for Associate
> Member status in accordance with Bylaw 3.1, subject to conditions
> designated by the CWG.
> The CWG SHALL allow participation by Interested Parties, as set forth
> in the Bylaws.
> Members may resign from the CWG at any time. Resignation or other
> termination of membership in the CWG does not prevent a Member from
> potentially having continuing obligations, under the Forum's IPR
> Policy or any other document.
> A Certificate Consumer Member's membership in the CWG will
> automatically cease if it stops providing updates for its
> membership-qualifying software product or six months have elapsed
> since the last such published update.
> A Certificate Issuer’s membership in the CWG may be suspended if any
> of the following become true:
> 1. it fails to pass its membership-qualifying audit;
> 2. its membership-qualifying audit is revoked, rescinded or
> 3. fifteen months have elapsed since the end of the audit
> period of its last successful membership-qualifying audit; or
> 4. it is no longer the case that its currently-issued
> certificates are treated as valid by at least one Certificate Consumer
> Any Member who believes one of the above circumstances is true of any
> other Member may report it on the CWG’s Public Mail List. The CWG
> Chair will then investigate, including asking the reported Member for
> an explanation or appropriate documentation. If evidence of continued
> qualification for membership is not forthcoming from the reported
> Member within five working days, the CWG Chair will announce that such
> Member is suspended, such announcement to include the basis upon which
> the suspension has been made. A suspended Member who believes it has
> now re-met the membership criteria under the relevant clauses shall
> provide evidence to the CWG Chair who SHALL post it to the CWG Public
> Mail List. The CWG Chair will examine the evidence and unsuspend the
> member, or not, by announcement to the CWG Public Mail List. A
> Member's membership will automatically cease six months after it
> becomes suspended if the Member has not re-met the membership criteria
> by that time.
> While suspended, a Member may participate in CWG Meetings, CWG
> Teleconferences, and on the CWG's discussion lists, but may not
> propose or endorse ballots or take part in any form of voting.
> Votes cast before the announcement of a Member's suspension will stand.
> 3. *Membership Declaration***
> In accordance with the IPR Policy, all Members that choose to
> participate in the CWG and Applicants SHALL formally declare their
> participation in writing submitted to the CWG Chair and SHALL do so
> prior to participating. The Chair of the CWG SHALL establish a list
> for declarations of participation and manage it in accordance with the
> Bylaws, the IPR Policy, and the IPR Policy Agreement.
> 5. *Voting and Other Organizational Matters*
> *5.1*The following rules will apply to all ballots, including Draft
> Guideline Ballots, defined in Bylaw 2.4.
> (a) Only votes by Members SHALL be accepted.
> (b) Only one vote per Member company SHALL be accepted;
> representatives of Affiliates SHALL NOT vote.
> (c) A representative of any Member MAY call for a proposed ballot to
> be published for discussion and comment by the membership. Any
> proposed ballot needs two endorsements by other Members in order to
> proceed. The discussion period then SHALL take place for at least
> seven calendar days before votes are cast. At any time, a new version
> of the ballot (marked with a distinguishing version number) may be
> posted by the proposer in the same manner as the original. Once no new
> version of the ballot has been posted for seven calendar days, the
> proposer may end the discussion period and start the voting period by
> reposting the final version of the ballot and clearly indicating that
> voting is to begin, along with the start and end dates and times
> (including time zone) for the voting period. The ballot automatically
> fails if 21 calendar days elapse since the proposer last posted a
> version of the ballot and the voting period has not been started.
> (d) Upon commencement of the voting period, Members SHALL have exactly
> seven calendar days for voting on the proposed ballot, with the
> deadline clearly communicated in the ballot and sent via the CWG Mail
> List. All voting will take place via the CWG Mail List. Votes not
> submitted to the CWG Mail List by the end of the voting period (as
> specified in the ballot) will not be considered valid and will not be
> counted for any purpose. Each Member, and not the CWG, will be
> responsible for taking precautions to make sure such Member’s vote is
> submitted properly and counted. In the event that a Member’s vote on a
> ballot is not submitted properly, such vote SHALL NOT be valid and
> SHALL NOT be counted for any purpose, and there SHALL be no appeal,
> revote (except in the case of a new ballot submitted to all Members)
> or other recourse.
> (e) Members MAY vote yes, no, or abstain on a ballot. Only votes that
> indicate a clear ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response to the ballot question SHALL
> be considered (i.e. votes to abstain and votes that do not indicate a
> clear ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response will not figure in the calculation of
> item (f), below).
> (f) Members fall into two categories for voting purposes—Certificate
> Issuers and Certificate Consumers, eligible as set forth in Section
> 4(b) above. In order for a ballot to be adopted by the CWG,
> two-thirds or more of the votes cast by the Members in the Certificate
> Issuer category must be in favor of the ballot, and more than 50% of
> the votes cast by the Members in the Certificate Consumer category
> must be in favor of the ballot. At least one Member in each category
> must vote in favor of a ballot for the ballot to be adopted.
> (g) A ballot result will be considered valid only when the number of
> votes cast meets Quorum. Quorum is defined as the larger of three (3)
> or the average number of Member organizations that have participated
> in the last three (3) CWG Meetings or Teleconferences (not counting
> subcommittee meetings thereof). For transition purposes, if three (3)
> meetings have not yet occurred, quorum is three (3).
> (h) The Chair SHALL tabulate and announce the results within 3
> business days of the close of the voting period.
> *5.2 Other Organizational Matters*
> (a) The Chair may delegate any of his/her duties to the Vice Chair as
> necessary. The Vice Chair has the authority of the Chair in the event
> of any absence or unavailability of the Chair, and in such
> circumstances, any duty delegated to the Chair herein may be performed
> by the Vice Chair. For example, the Vice Chair may preside at CWG
> Meetings and Teleconferences in the Chair’s absence.
> (b) CWG-created Subcommittees may be approved either (1) by formal
> ballot as described in 5.1(c) through (h), or (2) by simple majority
> vote of those members present at a regularly scheduled CWG Meeting or
> Teleconference provided that the proposal is mentioned in an agenda
> circulated on the CWG Mail List at least 24 hours prior to the CWG
> Meeting or Teleconference.
> 6. *Summary of Major Deliverables*
> The deliverables of the CWG are defined in the Scope section above.
> 7. *Primary Means of Communication*
> (a) The CWG SHALL appoint a webmaster to maintain the CWG’s pages on
> the wiki and the Forum’s Public Web Site.
> (b) The CWG will communicate primarily through listserv-based email in
> accordance with Bylaw 5.3.1(d). The CWG List SHALL be available to
> the public, who will not have posting privileges (i.e. anyone may
> subscribe to receive messages and the list may be crawled and indexed
> by Internet search engines).
> (c) The CWG SHALL conduct periodic calls or face-to-face meetings as
> needed. Minutes SHALL be kept, and such minutes SHALL be made public
> in accordance with Bylaw 5.2.
> 8. *IPR Policy and Antitrust Policy*
> As with all Forum Working Group activity, the IPR Policy, v1.3 or
> later, SHALL apply to all activities and work of the CWG. All
> Participants in the CWG SHALL have on file with the Forum a valid,
> signed IPR Policy Agreement (v.1.3). A previously submitted IPR
> Policy Agreement (v1.3) by an existing Member of the Forum shall
> suffice as meeting the obligation under section 4.5 of the IPR Policy
> that a Participant in the CWG commit to CAB Forum License requirements.
> In accordance with the Forum’s antitrust policy, the CWG Chair will
> read an antitrust compliance statement at the start of all Working
> Group Meetings, in substantially the following form:
> “As you know, this meeting includes companies that compete against one
> another. This meeting is intended to discuss technical standards
> related to the provision of existing and new types of digital
> certificates without restricting competition in developing and
> marketing such certificates. This meeting is not intended to share
> competitively-sensitive information among competitors, and therefore
> all participants agree not to discuss or exchange information related to:
> (a) Pricing policies, pricing formulas, prices or other terms
> of sale;
> (b) Costs, cost structures, profit margins,
> (c) Pending or planned service offerings,
> (d) Customers, business, or marketing plans; or
> (e) The allocation of customers, territories, or products in
> any way.”
> --- MOTION ENDS---
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
> *Discussion Period (7+ days):*
> Start Time: Sunday, 17-February-2019 at 0100 UTC
> End Time: Monday, 25-February-2019 at 1600 UTC
> *Vote for Approval (7 days):*
> Start Time: Monday, 25-February-2019 at 1600 UTC
> End Time: Monday, 4-March-2019 at 1600 UTC
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
Manager of Operations
~~~~~ To find the reefs, look~~~~~~~~
~~~~ for the wrecks. ~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public