[cabfpub] Draft Ballot Forum-4 for discussion

Tim Hollebeek tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Tue Sep 11 22:32:57 UTC 2018


I what you wrote below is some people’s opinion, but it isn’t mine and it wasn’t the intent.  The intent was that LWGs could just declare they wanted to become subcommittees, and they would be subcommittees.


If people want ballots for LWG migrations (and it seems they do), I want the 216 ballot rules that don’t make you lose two weeks every time you make a minor modification.


I want the same rules for some of my in progress ballots.  There simply isn’t a good reason to needlessly delay fixing the Bylaws even further.




However, as we discussed on the last call, the rules for creating a new subcommittee under a CWG are exactly the same as migrating an LWG to a subcommittee.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180911/7b1d2a3d/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180911/7b1d2a3d/attachment-0003.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list