[cabfpub] Draft Ballot Forum-4 for discussion
jimmy at it.auth.gr
Tue Sep 11 06:42:35 MST 2018
Thanks Tim, the changes seem to be in order. I have two suggestions.
1. Legacy WGs: If we delay this ballot for a couple of days and put it
for vote after October 3rd, the language around Legacy Working
Groups will be obsolete. I think it makes sense to wait a few days,
remove section 5.3.4 and language around LWG in section 5.2.
2. Consistency with representation of numbers in duration references:
Sometimes, we use the text "7 days", sometimes we say "seven days"
and sometimes we say "seven (7) days". I recommend changing all
references with the format "seven (7) days".
On 11/9/2018 4:17 μμ, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:
> Reverting to using a draft ballot to get things right on the first
> try, since I can’t make updates once the discussion starts … if a few
> eagle-eyed people (Dimitris? Ryan?) can review this ballot and the
> attached Bylaw changes, I’d appreciate it so we can get it up for vote
> Ballot FORUM-4: Fix mistakes made during passage of Governance Reform
> Ballot 206
> Purpose of Ballot
> The Governance Reform ballot (Ballot 206 under the old ballot
> numbering scheme) was extremely complicated and took roughly two years
> to draft. There were two changes to the Bylaws that the Governance
> Reform Working Group intended to be included in the Governance Reform
> ballot that were accidentally not included in the final version of the
> Bylaws attached to Ballot 206:
> 1. The changes to the rules about discussion periods that were
> approved in Ballot 216.
> 2. Dimitris’ fixes for the numbers of the ETSI standards required for
> membership, to more closely align with what we require for WebTrust
> The attached version of the Bylaws restores the important discussion
> period changes that were approved by the members but then accidentally
> overwritten, and adopts Dimitris’ improvements which were intended by
> the Governance Reform Working Group to be in Ballot 206 but were
> accidentally omitted.
> The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert
> and endorsed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC.
> --- MOTION BEGINS ---
> This ballot replaces the “Bylaws of the CA/Browser Forum” version 1.9
> with version 2.0 of those Bylaws, attached to this ballot.
> --- MOTION ENDS ---
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
> Discussion (7 days)
> Start Time: 2018-09-12, 9:00 am Eastern Time
> End Time: 2018-09-19, 9:00 am Eastern Time
> Vote for approval (7 days)
> Start Time: 2018-09-19, 9:00am Eastern Time
> End Time: 2018-09-26, 9:00am Eastern Time
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public