[cabfpub] Ballot SC5: Election of Server Certificate Working Group Vice Chair

[Moudrick M. Dadashov]

Tim, you have the second endorser.

Thanks,
M.D.

On 9/7/2018 5:26 PM, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:
>
> This is correct.  The ballot requirements for endorsers and discussion 
> periods applies to _/all/_ ballots.  The bylaws are pretty clear on 
> that; it’s even in the title of section 2.3.
>
> The fact that 4.1(c) of the bylaws requires a ballot does not override 
> the usual ballot rules.
>
> I really hate to nitpick about things like this, but I felt I had to 
> point it out.
>
> Also if we could get a second endorser to fix the voting rules after 
> Ballot 216 got accidentally overwritten, that’d be great.  I can write 
> up the ballot over the weekend.
>
> -Tim
>
> *From:* Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of *Wayne 
> Thayer via Public
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:55 PM
> *To:* Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum 
> Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Ballot SC5: Election of Server Certificate 
> Working Group Vice Chair
>
> Bylaws section 2.3 ("General Provisions Applicable to all Ballots") 
> says "Any proposed ballot needs two endorsements by other Members in 
> order to proceed." The language in section 4 describing "confirmation 
> ballots" and "election ballots" appears to fall under this requirement.
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:33 PM Kirk Hall via Public 
> <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
>
>     DigiCert has not specified the concerns it has with the form of
>     ballot.
>
>     *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com
>     <mailto:sleevi at google.com>]
>     *Sent:* Thursday, September 6, 2018 3:14 PM
>     *To:* Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com
>     <mailto:Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>>; CABFPub
>     <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
>     *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Ballot SC5: Election of Server
>     Certificate Working Group Vice Chair
>
>     Doesn't this ballot have the same issues with compliance to our
>     Bylaws that DigiCert noted? That is, consistency with Section 2.3
>     of the Bylaws?
>
>     On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kirk Hall via Public
>     <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
>
>         *Ballot SC5:  Election of Server Certificate Working Group
>         Vice Chair – Term Nov. 1, 2018 – Oct. 31, 2020*
>
>         **
>
>         *-Motion begins-*
>
>         In accordance with Bylaw 4.1(c), *Wayne Thayer *is hereby
>         elected Vice Chair of the Server Certificate Working Group for
>         a term commencing on November 1, 2018 and continuing through
>         October 31, 2020.
>
>         *-Motion ends-*
>
>         The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
>
>         Votes should be either “Yes” or “No”, and should be sent to
>         the *_Public_* list.
>
>         Voting period: (7 days)
>
>
>         Start Time: *Thursday, September 6 at 11:00 am Eastern Time*
>
>
>         End Time: *Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 11:00 am Eastern Time*
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Public mailing list
>         Public at cabforum.org <mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
>         https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Public mailing list
>     Public at cabforum.org <mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
>     https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180907/a004720a/attachment.html>