[cabfpub] Draft Bylaws 5.6 - Subcommittees of the CA/Browser Forum

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Mon Oct 15 22:00:19 MST 2018


On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:45 PM Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org>
wrote:

> Here is a possible amendment to the Bylaws that would allow us to create
> Subcommittees of the Forum, and would require the same transparency as is
> required today for the Forum.
>
>
>
> This Bylaws change could be passed by a Forum ballot in as little as two
> weeks.  We could then have a second ballot to create a Governance
> Subcommittee of the Forum.  No IP issues are involved, so there is no
> requirement of IPR Review.
>

Thank you for your suggestion. It certainly is one approach that can take,
and it seems one that does not incorporate any of the feedback that members
have offered, but it certainly provides a path forward.

Can you help explain what assessment Entrust Datacard has done on the
provided language and its implications? And what other members you've
consulted, to lead to the confidence that there are no IP issues involved?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20181016/da599f39/attachment.html>


More information about the Public mailing list