[cabfpub] Voting ENDS on Oct. 5 for Forum-7 - Update ETSI requirements in the SCWG Charter

Tue Oct 2 03:29:21 MST 2018

Logius PKIoverheid votes YES to ballot Forum-7.

Kind regards,

Jochem van den Berge

Logius PKIoverheid
Public Key Infrastructure for the Dutch government
........................................................................
Logius
Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK)
Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 52 | 2595 AN | The Hague
PO Box 96810 | 2509 JE | The Hague
........................................................................
jochem.vanden.berge at logius.nl<mailto:Jochem.vanden.berge at logius.nl>
http://www.logius.nl

Van: Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> Namens Kirk Hall via Public
Verzonden: dinsdag 2 oktober 2018 00:09
Aan: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Onderwerp: [cabfpub] Voting ENDS on Oct. 5 for Forum-7 - Update ETSI requirements in the SCWG Charter

Voting ENDS on Friday, Oct. 5 for Forum-7 - Update ETSI requirements in the SCWG Charter.  (This ballot is the companion to Ballot Fprim-6, which just passed today.)

From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 12:48 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] VOTING HAS STARTED Forum-7 - Update ETSI requirements in the SCWG Charter

Voting has also started for ballot Forum-7.

HARICA votes "yes" to ballot Forum-7.

Dimitris.

On 21/9/2018 8:03 πμ, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public wrote:

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and endorsed by Moudrick M. Dadashov of SSC and Mads Egil Henriksveen from Bypass.

Background:

Section 3 of the SCWG Charter describes the qualifying criteria for "Certificate Issuers" and "Root Certificate Issuers". This ballot attempts to remove references to the old ETSI TS documents.

-- MOTION BEGINS --

In Section 3 of the SCWG Charter, update the ETSI references:

Replace "ETSI TS 102042, ETSI 101456, or ETSI EN 319 411-1"
with "or ETSI EN 319 411-1".

-- MOTION ENDS --

Here is a red-line of these particular changes.

(1) Certificate Issuer: The member organization operates a certification authority that has a current and successful WebTrust for CAs audit, or ETSI TS 102042, ETSI 101456, or ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit report prepared by a properly-qualified auditor, and that actively issues certificates to Web servers that are openly accessible from the Internet, such certificates being treated as valid when using a browser created by a Certificate Consumer Member. Applicants that are not actively issuing certificates but otherwise meet membership criteria may be granted Associate Member status under Bylaw Sec. 3.1 for a period of time to be designated by the Forum.
(2) Root Certificate Issuer: The member organization operates a certification authority that has a current and successful WebTrust for CAs, or ETSI TS 102042, ETSI TS 101456, ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit report prepared by a properly-qualified auditor, and that actively issues certificates to subordinate CAs that, in turn, actively issue certificates to Web servers that are openly accessible from the Internet, such certificates being treated as valid when using a browser created by a Certificate Consumer Member. Applicants that are not actively issuing certificates but otherwise meet membership criteria may be granted Associate Member status under Bylaw Sec. 3.1 for a period of time to be designated by the Forum.

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Forum-7 - Update ETSI requirements in the SCWG Charter

Start time (22:00 UTC)

End time (22:00 UTC)

Discussion (7 days)

21 September 2018

28 September 2018

Vote for approval (7 days)

28 September 2018

5 October 2018

_______________________________________________

Public mailing list

Public at cabforum.org<mailto:Public at cabforum.org>

https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20181002/010a30d7/attachment-0001.html>