[cabfpub] For Discussion: S/MIME Working Group Charter

[Ryan Sleevi]

In that spirit, do you plan to update with the proposed feedback? Is there
perhaps some way to track what is currently being discussed, to make sure
that as feedback such as this flows in, it's being tracked and kept up to
date? It sounds like there's a relatively major rewrite to address these
issues so far, might be easier to have a refresh to make sure we're on the
same page and productively moving towards that goal :)

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
wrote:

> Yes, it’s definitely going to be a long multi-year process, but as long as
> people work together and participate constructively, I am confident we can
> get it done.  The most important thing is that we’ve started this effort
> and taken the first few steps.  Now we just need to keep going.
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
> It seems that we all agree that "BRs for S/MIME 1.0" is the first
> deliverable of this WG, so let's charter it with that clear mission in
> mind. This is almost certainly a multi-year task, after which a recharter
> in line with the practice of other SDOs will be entirely reasonable.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180521/c7161cb8/attachment.html>