[cabfpub] For Discussion: S/MIME Working Group Charter

[Wayne Thayer]

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:02 AM Ryan Sleevi via Public <public at cabforum.org>
wrote:

> Do we really need "one or more"? Isn't that the same problem of "We may or
> may not boil the ocean along the way"?
>
> <
+1
>

> Concrete deliverables, along with lightweight rechartering, is a model
> that most SDOs have successfully adopted. The challenge of greenfield
> explorations always exist, as do these discussions about charters, but the
> success or failure of the SDO and the effort so frequently relies on how
> effectively, and narrowly, the charter was scoped to the defined problem at
> hand.
>

It seems that we all agree that "BRs for S/MIME 1.0" is the first
deliverable of this WG, so let's charter it with that clear mission in
mind. This is almost certainly a multi-year task, after which a recharter
in line with the practice of other SDOs will be entirely reasonable.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180518/9cfb1ff6/attachment-0001.html>