[cabfpub] [Ext] BR Authorized Ports, add 8443

Tim Hollebeek tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Fri Mar 2 16:20:59 UTC 2018

We’re willing to continue talking through those issues in an attempt to reach a solution.  I do think SRVNames would be a useful improvement.  For us, the lack of movement has had more to do with time constraints than technical constraints!


While SRVNames do offer a way to scope the authority to a particular service (on any port), there's been no movement towards adopting them in the CA/Browser Forum, due to the issues they would have with technically constrained sub-CAs. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180302/ac171e0d/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180302/ac171e0d/attachment-0003.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list