[cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

Tim Hollebeek tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Mon Jan 15 18:06:28 UTC 2018

I had that concern too, but thought that this way if anyone looks for what
happened to method 11, they get a pretty clear answer that they can't use
method 11 anymore.

I had a slight concern that something like [OBSOLETE] would fail to indicate
that only is the method out of date, you MUST NOT use it.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase
> Markham via Public
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 10:01 AM
> To: Tim Hollebeek via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5
> On 12/01/18 19:07, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:
> > Gerv might want to take a look at how I handled
> I guess that works, although some might find it a bit confusing to have
such a
> statement in the middle of the list rather than e.g. in the introductory
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180115/dae7b9c5/attachment-0003.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list