[cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5
Tim Hollebeek
tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Thu Jan 11 15:36:09 UTC 2018
That's a good point.
-Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase
> Markham via Public
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:41 AM
> To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion
> List <public at cabforum.org>; Daymion T. Reynolds <dreynolds at godaddy.com>
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5
>
> On 10/01/18 23:49, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
> > "3.2.2.4.11 Validating Applicant as a Domain Contact
>
> Nit: for some time, 3.2.2.4.11 was "Any Other Method". I think we should
not
> reuse numbers in this section, for clarity. So the motion should specify
> 3.2.2.4.11 as "[Obsoleted]" and have this one as 3.2.2.4.12.
>
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180111/036fd398/attachment-0003.p7s>
More information about the Public
mailing list