[cabfpub] Draft ballot 219: Clarify handling of CAA Record Sets with no "issue"/"issuewild" property tag
tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Thu Jan 25 08:46:37 MST 2018
> On 24/01/18 21:45, Corey Bonnell via Public wrote:
> > Given that the intent of the RFC is clear (such a CAA Resource Record
> > Set is implicit permission to issue), we are proposing the following
> > change to allow for CAA processing consistent with the intent of the RFC.
> I don't think the intent of the RFC on this point is particularly clear, but
> I agree
> that specified behaviour is better than unspecified.
I'd recommend reading my analysis that Corey referenced if you haven't
If you still think the intent is unclear after reading it, I'd appreciate
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Public