[cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5
tim.hollebeek at digicert.com
Mon Jan 15 11:06:28 MST 2018
I had that concern too, but thought that this way if anyone looks for what
happened to method 11, they get a pretty clear answer that they can't use
method 11 anymore.
I had a slight concern that something like [OBSOLETE] would fail to indicate
that only is the method out of date, you MUST NOT use it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase
> Markham via Public
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 10:01 AM
> To: Tim Hollebeek via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5
> On 12/01/18 19:07, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:
> > Gerv might want to take a look at how I handled 220.127.116.11.11.
> I guess that works, although some might find it a bit confusing to have
> statement in the middle of the list rather than e.g. in the introductory
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Public