[cabfpub] Attendance of Interested Parties at Working Group meetings

[Gervase Markham]

On 05/02/18 17:05, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> I appreciate the sentiment towards getting it out, but I also think it's
> worth highlighting that the failure to carefully review things - or to
> allow time for that - especially for something as significant as an
> IP-affecting change - has consistently harmed the overall productivity
> of the Forum.

Failure by whom? There have been innumerable rounds of review, and calls
for review, and pleadings for review. At what point do we stop? How
would you judge it? What would be your ballot triggers?

Gerv