[cabfpub] Attendance of Interested Parties at Working Group meetings

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Mon Feb 5 10:39:05 MST 2018


On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:

> On 05/02/18 17:05, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> > I appreciate the sentiment towards getting it out, but I also think it's
> > worth highlighting that the failure to carefully review things - or to
> > allow time for that - especially for something as significant as an
> > IP-affecting change - has consistently harmed the overall productivity
> > of the Forum.
>
> Failure by whom? There have been innumerable rounds of review, and calls
> for review, and pleadings for review. At what point do we stop? How
> would you judge it? What would be your ballot triggers?


And there's also been continued changes and corrections which themselves
introduce new issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180205/76be9675/attachment.html>


More information about the Public mailing list