[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL] Ballot SC6 - Revocation Timeline Extension
wthayer at mozilla.com
Thu Aug 16 14:35:17 MST 2018
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:13 PM Curt Spann <cspann at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
> Have you considered adding language to address what happens if the domain
> registration is sold or transferred to other person/org? I am thinking of
> the scenario where a person buys a domain name and would like the
> previously issues certificates (which are still time valid) revoked.
> Yes, I did add language to cover that scenario: "The CA obtains evidence
that the validation of domain authorization or control for any
Fully-Qualified Domain Name or IP address in the Certificate should not be
There was some debate about how specific we should make this requirement
 that resulted in the ballot language.
Another question I have is related to the the wording “in writing”. Is that
> defined somewhere?
> From the ballot text:
> The CA SHALL revoke a Certificate within 24 hours if:
> 1. The Subscriber requests in *writing* that the CA revoke the
> No, I don't believe that phrase is defined. However it is the existing
language and is used in two other places in the BRs. I believe the typical
interpretation is paper, fax, email, or other forms of electronic
communication such as a form submission from the CA's website.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public