[cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

Fri Aug 10 11:33:43 MST 2018

Fixing an obvious typo really shouldn’t require restarting the process.  However, I realize that we were never able to agree on the definition of a “typo.”  😩

On Aug 10, 2018, at 10:22 AM, public-request at cabforum.org wrote:

Send Public mailing list submissions to
	public at cabforum.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	public-request at cabforum.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	public-owner at cabforum.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Public digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working
     Group (Tim Hollebeek)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:21:59 +0000
From: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
To: "Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>, CA/Browser Forum
	Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>, "jimmy at it.auth.gr"
	<jimmy at it.auth.gr>,  Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure
	Working Group
Message-ID:
	<BN6PR14MB1106FCA38C47398550EA84B783240 at BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Jos, as a procedural note, if you want to change the ballot, you have to post an updated version and restart the discussion period.  You can?t make changes before voting.

I?d suggest doing that ASAP to avoid further delays.

-Tim

From: Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:05 AM
To: jimmy at it.auth.gr; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>; Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

Whoops! Apologies for not picking that up. Yes, it?s a typo. Final language will read:

*	The FIWG will not create Final Guidelines or Final Maintenance Guidelines as defined in the Bylaws and IPR Policy.

-- 
Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com> )
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)

From: "jimmy at it.auth.gr <mailto:jimmy at it.auth.gr> " <jimmy at it.auth.gr <mailto:jimmy at it.auth.gr> >
Date: Friday, 10 August, 2018 at 10:28 
To: "Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com> >, CA/B Forum Public List <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org> >, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com <mailto:sleevi at google.com> >
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

I would also assume it's a typo. Jos will have to confirm. 

Dimitris. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Sleevi via Public <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org> >
To: "Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com> >, CABFPub <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org> >
Sent: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:57
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 1:46 PM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com <mailto:sleevi at google.com> > wrote:

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 10:30 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public <public at cabforum.org <mailto:public at cabforum.org> > wrote:

Final version of the ballot (with fixed dates) is below; discussion period starts today!

-- 
Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com> )
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)

Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

Purpose of Ballot

The CA/Browser Forum has grown considerably over the last few years and is now dividing its work into multiple working groups to more carefully address specific certificate needs. The responsibilities of managing the various components of infrastructure necessary for the Forum to conduct its work, such as the wiki and mailing lists, has grown considerably. With immense gratitude to each of the Forum members that have helped to provide this infrastructure, the work of managing it should no longer be left as a volunteer best-effort function of any single Forum member. This ballot would establish a working group chartered to help ensure the infrastructure supporting the Forum continues to meet its needs. 

The following motion has been proposed by Jos Purvis of Cisco and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of Digicert and Wayne Thayer of Mozilla.

? MOTION BEGINS ?

Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

Upon approval of the CAB Forum by ballot in accordance with Section 5.3 of the Bylaws, the Forum Infrastructure Working Group (?FIWG?) is created to perform the activities as specified in this Charter, subject to the terms and conditions of the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy, as such documents may change from time to time. The definitions found in the Forum?s Bylaws shall apply to capitalized terms in this Charter.

Scope

The authorized scope of the Forum Infrastructure Working Group shall be as follows:

1.	To oversee the acquisition, operation, and maintenance of the common CA/Browser Forum website and wiki resources;
2.	To coordinate updates to public and Forum-facing web and wiki content in support of the Forum Webmaster role established in the Bylaws;
3.	To create and manage the division of access and content spaces required to help ensure the separation of the work of various Working Groups and accompanying commitments, as described in the Forum?s IPR Policy;
4.	To manage the Forum-level email lists and to offer management of working-group and subcommittee mailing lists as needed in support of the Forum List Manager role established in the Bylaws;
5.	To perform other activities ancillary to the primary activities listed above.

Out of Scope

The following items are considered out of scope for the Working Group under this charter:

*	The FIWG will not address coordination of Forum or Working Group face-to-face meetings.
*	The FIWG will not create Maintenance Guidelines or Final Maintenance Guidelines as defined in the Bylaws and IPR Policy.

Jos,

Is this a typo here? I believe it's meant to be "Final Guideline or Final Maintenance Guideline" as defined by the Bylaws and IPR policy - is that correct?

Checking in here, just to make sure we've got it cleared up before voting :)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180810/81a658d0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180810/81a658d0/attachment.p7s>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

------------------------------

End of Public Digest, Vol 76, Issue 45
**************************************