[cabfpub] Ballot 223 - Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria

Arno Fiedler arno.fiedler at nimbus-berlin.com
Fri Apr 27 11:21:54 UTC 2018


Hello Dimitris,

so starting at Mai 1th is fine, if we get 21 days for discussion.

Best regards

arno


Am 27.04.2018 um 07:39 schrieb Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public:
>
> So far the discussion has been quiet which either means people 
> generally agree with the ballot or that nobody had time to review it :-)
>
> I plan on starting the voting period on May 1st unless we hear some 
> strong objections.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 23/4/2018 8:18 πμ, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public wrote:
>>
>>
>> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of 
>> HARICA and endorsed by Moudrick M. Dadashov of SSC and Tim Hollebeek 
>> from Digicert.
>>
>> *Background*:
>>
>> Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements describes the audit criteria 
>> for CAs that issue Publicly-Trusted SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot 
>> attempts to achieve two things:
>>
>>  1. Remove the old ETSI TS documents
>> 2.
>>
>>     Align the WebTrust and ETSI requirements
>>
>> "WebTrust for Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 
>> 319 401" and "WebTrust Principles and Criteria for Certification 
>> Authorities – SSL Baseline with Network Security" is equivalent to 
>> "ETSI EN 319 411-1".
>>
>> *-- MOTION BEGINS --*
>>
>> Replace the first two numbered items in section 8.4 from:
>>
>> 1.
>>
>>     WebTrust for Certification Authorities v2.0;
>>
>>  2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 /
>>     ETSI EN 319 411-1; or
>>
>> to:
>>
>> 1.
>>
>>     "WebTrust for CAs v2.0 or newer" AND "WebTrust for CAs SSL
>>     Baseline with Network Security v2.2 or newer"; or
>>
>>  2. "ETSI EN 319 401 v2.1.1 or newer" AND "ETSI EN 319 411-1 v1.1.1"; or
>>
>> *-- MOTION ENDS --*
>>
>> The procedure for this ballot is as follows (exact start and end 
>> times may be adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR 
>> Agreement):
>>
>> *BALLOT 223 Status: Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria*
>>
>> 	
>>
>> *Start time (22:00 UTC)*
>>
>> 	
>>
>> *End time (22:00 UTC)*
>>
>> Discussion (7+ days)
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 23 April 2018
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 30 April 2018
>>
>> Vote for approval (7 days)
>>
>> 	
>>
>> TBD
>>
>> 	
>>
>> TBD according to voting start time
>>
>> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) 
>> (30 days)
>> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to 
>> be created.
>> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of 
>> Review Period.
>> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the 
>> Public Mail List.
>>
>> 	
>>
>> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>>
>> From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft Guideline Ballot is 
>> proposing a Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a 
>> redline or comparison showing the set of changes from the Final 
>> Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance 
>> Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full set of guidelines. 
>> Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final Guideline 
>> section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need 
>> not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed 
>> subsequently, except as provided in Section 2.4(j) below".
>>
>> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the 
>> Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 
>> 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in 
>> the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in 
>> the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote 
>> received from any representative of a voting member before the close 
>> of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: 
>> https://cabforum.org/members/ 
>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcabforum.org%2Fmembers%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C38331e54981341187a6508d5ac014ae7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636604043901501245&sdata=hxkdSje8Fvk6xsS942EenBP2jU43pcvRSv0gJIPJ4fg%3D&reserved=0> 
>>
>>
>> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the 
>> votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the 
>> votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. 
>> Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under the Bylaws section 
>> 2.3(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the 
>> ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting 
>> against, or abstaining.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Public mailing list
>> Public at cabforum.org
>> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpublic&data=02%7C01%7C%7C38331e54981341187a6508d5ac014ae7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636604043901657497&sdata=yfcaS78wsAZVH7wtKQ5APB%2F0ejm2tk%2BtxzSu6vwz3HM%3D&reserved=0

-- 
Arno Fiedler
Nimbus Technologieberatung GmbH
Reichensteiner Weg 17
14195 Berlin
Mobil:      0049-(0)172-3053272
Fax:        0049-(0)30-89745-777
E-Mail:     arno.fiedler at nimbus-berlin.com
Web:        www.nimbus-berlin.com
Geschäftsführer:  Arno Fiedler
USt-IdNr. :       DE 203 269 920
D-U-N-S® Nr.      50-730-8117
HandelsregisterNr:HRB 109409 B

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180427/c53b3555/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: arno_fiedler.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 302 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180427/c53b3555/attachment-0003.vcf>


More information about the Public mailing list