[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Fixing our voting process, again

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Gervase Markham via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> On 25/09/17 16:48, Kirk Hall wrote:
> > Yes, good idea.  If no movement to voting after 21 days, the ballot dies?
>
> Yes. It would require tweaks in a few places, including to our template
> (because the entire timeline would not be knowable at the beginning) but
> I still think it's an improvement.
>
> > Also, we make clear that the ballot can be amended during the
> > discussion period (and must be reposted with amendments for clarity)?
> > That's not explicit today.
>
> Yes, we could do that too. Do we want to restart the "min 7 days" each
> time this happens, or do we want to continue with the gentleman's
> arrangement of not sliding massive changes in just under the wire?


At a minimum, this would be necessary to ensure ample and sufficient
review. As we know and have seen from past discussions, such agreements
rarely provide the level of assurance one would hope for.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170927/bd1ac2bb/attachment-0001.html>