[cabfpub] Preballot - Revised Ballot 190

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Thu May 18 14:16:27 UTC 2017

On 17/05/17 19:33, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org
> <mailto:gerv at mozilla.org>> wrote:
>     What's the alternative proposal, given that many or most CAs can't do
>     per-method rules right now?
> The proposed extension would be simply that the CAs which haven't
> maintained those records can still signal a BR version 1.4.2 (or 1.4.1
> or equivalent). As they gather/complete such records, they can signal a
> BR version 1.4.x.

You misunderstand me. If you want different data reuse rules (a separate
question from encoding BR version in the certs), what would they be and
how would they work? Or are you happy with the data reuse rules proposed?


More information about the Public mailing list