[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Preballot - Revised Ballot 190

[Ryan Sleevi]

Does that mean you'll be withdrawing the proposal to reuse data, which is a
new provision?

I hope you can understand the desire here to find an equitable balance that
works for all parties. We're putting the ecosystem at risk due to some CAs
poor security practices. Being transparent about that does not seem an
unreasonable request, particularly if it can help ensure relying parties
know how to differentiate the certificates from those that have invested in
modern security practices.

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
wrote:

> We need to adopt this ballot without new provisions.
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:54 PM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Cc:* Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Preballot - Revised Ballot 190
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> +1 to what? Doug asked questions.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170517/0d5bb67d/attachment-0003.html>