[cabfpub] Ballot 199 - Require commonName in Root and Intermediate Certificates

Mon May 8 05:19:10 UTC 2017

HARICA votes "yes" to ballot 199.

Dimitris.

On 5/5/2017 4:22 μμ, Gervase Markham via Public wrote:
>
> ///This is the corrected text (one word change) of ballot 199 which is 
> currently in the voting period (voting ends on 9th May)./
>
> *Ballot 199 - Require commonName in Root and Intermediate Certificates
> *
>
> *Purpose of Ballot: *Section 7.1.4.3 of the BRs, which deals with 
> Subject Information for Subordinate CA Certificates, currently 
> requires only that all information in a Subordinate CA Certificate is 
> accurate; it does not say what information is required. Some of the 
> necessary information is required elsewhere in the BRs, but it is not 
> complete - commonName is missing. If commonName is omitted, DN clashes 
> can more easily occur. So this motion centralises that information in 
> the obvious place, and adds a commonName requirement.
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla 
> and endorsed by Patrick Tronnier of OATI and Ryan Sleevi of Google:
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
>
> Make the following changes to the Baseline Requirements:
> * Delete 7.1.2.1 (e), which currently defines the Subject Information required in a Root CA Certificate.
>
> * Delete 7.1.2.2 (h), which currently defines the Subject Information required in a Subordinate CA Certificate.
>
> * Rename section 7.1.4.2, currently titled "Subject Information", to "Subject Information - Subscriber Certificates".
>
> * Rename section 7.1.4.3, currently titled "Subject Information - Subordinate CA Certificates" to "Subject Information - Root Certificates and Subordinate CA Certificates".
>
> * Based on the style used in 7.1.4.2.2 and the content from the now-deleted 7.1.2.1 (e) and 7.1.2.2 (h), add the following section 7.1.4.3.1:
>
> 7.1.4.3.1 Subject Distinguished Name Fields
>
> Certificate Field: subject:commonName (OID 2.5.4.3)
> Required/Optional: Required
> Contents: This field MUST be present and the contents SHOULD be an identifier
> for the certificate such that the certificate's Name is unique across all
> certificates issued by the issuing certificate.
>
> b. Certificate Field: subject:organizationName (OID 2.5.4.10)
> Required/Optional: Required
> Contents: This field MUST be present and the contents MUST contain
> either the Subject CA’s name or DBA as verified under Section 3.2.2.2.
> The CA may include information in this field that differs slightly from
> the verified name, such as common variations or abbreviations,  provided
> that the CA documents the difference and any abbreviations used are
> locally accepted abbreviations; e.g., if the official record shows
> “Company Name Incorporated”, the CA MAY use “Company Name Inc.” or
> “Company Name”.
>
> c. Certificate Field: subject:countryName (OID: 2.5.4.6)
> Required/Optional: Required
> Contents: This field MUST contain the two‐letter ISO 3166‐1 country code
> for the country in which the CA’s place of business is located.
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot 
> is as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply 
> with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
> BALLOT 199
>
> Status: Final Maintenance Guideline
>
> 	
>
> Start time (23:00 UTC)
>
> 	
>
> End time (23:00 UTC)
>
> Discussion (7 to 14 days)
>
> 	
>
> 25 Apr
>
> 	
>
> 2 May
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> 	
>
> 2 May
>
> 	
>
> 9 May
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) 
> (30 days).
>
> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to 
> be created.
>
> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of 
> Review Period.
>
> 	
>
> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> 	
>
> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final 
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or 
> comparison showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline 
> section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need 
> not include a copy of the full set of guidelines.  Such redline or 
> comparison shall be made against the Final Guideline section(s) as 
> they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need not take into 
> consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except 
> as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the 
> Public list.  A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 
> 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in 
> the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the 
> response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote 
> received from any representative of a voting member before the close 
> of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: 
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes 
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes 
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is 
> shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki.  Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the 
> required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot 
> to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170508/c7c9f618/attachment-0003.html>