[cabfpub] Ballot 190

[Gervase Markham]

On 03/05/17 07:08, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public wrote:
> I think Gerv's proposal
> (https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-April/010804.html) is a big
> improvement because some validation information is harder to acquire
> than others. Methods that can be automated (like 3.2.2.4.6 or 3.2.2.4.7)
> could re-use information for a lot less than 13 months.

I think that even if the ballot goes with having the same policy for all
methods, the organizational split I mentioned would be valuable because
in the future, individual methods may be updated one at a time, and we
will want to write custom legacy data reuse policies at that point.

Gerv