[cabfpub] Ballot 190

[Jeremy Rowley]

How does this work if the intermediate doesn't contain the anyPolicy OID? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase
Markham via Public
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 9:08 AM
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
<public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 190

On 01/05/17 16:02, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> I did. It allows users to make an informed decision of the 
> trustworthiness of the information presented in the certificate, much 
> like EV policy OIDs and OV policy OIDs reportedly provide a stronger 
> level of assertion.

Did you anticipate a marker both for the validation method and also for the
version of the BRs used? Both would be needed to pin it down exactly.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4964 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170501/39d56d8f/attachment-0001.p7s>