[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot 190

[Gervase Markham]

On 28/04/17 18:52, Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public wrote:
> A question, if I might: I’m not understanding the “massive revalidation
> of all existing domains” part here. My understanding is that if we alter
> the methods of validation, you would need to ensure that any applicants
> from that date forward are validated under acceptable methods, which may
> mean searching your database of validated domains and marking some as
> requiring revalidation, but that shouldn’t require you to /immediately/
> revalidate them unless they’re applying for a certificate…

Yes, that is correct.

Gerv