[cabfpub] Naming rules

陳立群 realsky at cht.com.tw
Fri Mar 3 11:19:10 UTC 2017


Peter,
 
  
-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Peter Bowen via Public
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 11:29 AM

We have had a number of discussions over the last few months about the content of Subject Names in Certificates.  I promised on a recent call to try to summarize one of the issues, including the issue that Li-Chun has raised.

The Baseline Requirements specify how Names are to be constructed.  There are rules about which attributes must appear in names and what the content of the attributes must be.

There are other existing PKIs with different naming rules.  Another PKI could forbid an attribute required by the BRs.  Alternatively another PKI could require that the full Name be taken verbatim from some other source, such as an existing Directory Information Tree; these Names many not include attributes required by the BRs.

I believe the government on Taiwan falls into the latter case.  They have a PKI which has the policy that names must be taken from an existing Directory Information Tree operated by the government.  Many of the Names in the existing DIT don’t include attributes that are required by the BRs.  Therefore the question is whether we should make an exception to allow this existing PKI to be declared BR-compliant by adding some language like “ If a Government CA is required by its Certificate Policy to use Subject Names from a Directory Information Tree operated by a Government Entity, then section 7.1.4.2.2 shall not apply.”

Li-Chun: Did I get this right?

===> I appreciate you take into account the situations where existing PKIs such as government PKI might already have an Directory Information Tree with different naming rules. Especially, the Directory Information Tree might have already existed far before CABF SSL BR & EVGL were defined.


Others: Does this make the issue clearer?

Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public



本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. 
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.





More information about the Public mailing list