[cabfpub] Results on Ballot 187 - Make CAA Checking Mandatory

[Gervase Markham]

On 17/03/17 18:02, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> But it's not moot for relying parties or for browsers, as your
> interpretation effectively prevents any assurance of issuer-parameters
> from being useful and deployed, even if you do not wish to do so.

I think this is the key point. I want implementations not to barf on
iodef records, even if they don't do anything with them. Therefore, it
must be required to process them. However, it is not required to act on
them. The current text, I believe, says this. I am open to better texts
saying the same thing, but I am not open to changing the requirement's
meaning.

Gerv