[cabfpub] FW: Naming rules

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Mon Mar 6 11:24:12 MST 2017


On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org>
wrote:

> Yes, I agree with your analysis, Gerv.  And one member - was it Izenpe? -
> already used BR 9.16.3 to make an exception to the BRs as required by
> Spanish law, as I recall.
>
> I was under the impression by the many months of discussing this issue
> that the naming rules in Taiwan were required by law, and Chunghwa was in a
> bind.  If the naming rules are NOT required by law, then we don't need to
> discuss this any further.


Firmaprofessional -
https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2016-June/007896.html

Note that the discussion also pointed out that the applicable law was
repealed, and as such, the Forum did not discuss whether 9.16.3 applied. It
was seen as historical note.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170306/b79b3206/attachment.html>


More information about the Public mailing list