[cabfpub] Baseline Requirements "Certificate Policy" for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates

[陳立群]

Hi, Ryan,

 

     Thanks for your replying. We will update our CPS to add “Certificate Policy” for Baseline Requirements.

 

    And I find 4.Definition of EVGL about Baseline Requirements should be changed from 

 

Baseline Requirements: The Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates as

published by the CA/Browser Forum and any amendments to such document.

 

 

To 

 

 

Baseline Requirements: The Baseline Requirements Certificate Policy for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates as published by the CA/Browser Forum and any amendments to such document.

 

    I will propose a ballot to fix the issue.

 

      Li-Chun Chen

 

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:41 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Cc: 陳立群
Subject: [外部郵件] Re: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements "Certificate Policy" for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates

 

Hi Li-Chun,

 

On the basis of the bylaws, this should be conducted as a balloted change to correct. I'm sure there would be no objection to a ballot making this typographical fix :)

 

With respect to what obligations or impact it has on CAs, you don't need to wait for a ballot to correct this when updating your CPS. This is because the text prior to what you quoted clearly indicates that the text is an _example_ way to fulfill the requirement/obligation. That is,

 

"The CA SHALL publicly give effect to these Requirements and represent that it will adhere to the latest 

published version.  The CA MAY fulfill this requirement by incorporating these Requirements directly into its 

Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statements or by incorporating them by reference using a 

clause such as the following (which MUST include a link to the official version of these Requirements): "

 

See how it's a "MAY" (meaning it's an example) of how to fulfill the MUST (publicly giving effect)

 

 

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:40 AM, 陳立群 via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:

We found the cover of  Baseline Requirements from Version 1.3.0 (please see https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/, ), it added "Certificate Policy" as below

 

CA/Browser Forum

Baseline Requirements

Certificate Policy

for the

Issuance and Management of

Publicly-Trusted Certificates

 

I wonder that should we change the sentences in section 2.2  of Baseline Requirements from 

 

 

[Name of CA] conforms to the current version of the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly‐Trusted Certificates published at http://www.cabforum.org. In the event of any inconsistency between this document and those Requirements, those Requirements take precedence over this document.

 

to 

 

[Name of CA] conforms to the current version of the Baseline Requirements Certificate Policy for the Issuance

and Management of Publicly‐Trusted Certificates published at http://www.cabforum.org. In the event of any inconsistency between this document and those Requirements, those Requirements take precedence over this document.

 

   For this situation, do we need another vote? or will there be any other treatment? And CA should amend their CPS in section 1.2.  I want to hear the opinion. Thanks.

 

 

     Li-Chun Chen

     Chunghwa Telecom

 

本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. 

Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.

 

 


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

 



本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. 
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170621/40720a22/attachment-0003.html>