[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: CA/Browser Face to Face Meeting 41 Agenda – Berlin

Kirk Hall Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com
Tue Jun 13 22:01:17 UTC 2017

Ryan, we would be very pleased if you proposed additional enterprise certificate users to speak as well, who can share their point of view.  But I believe all input is welcome, and I would think you would welcome it – you have asked CAs to bring forward customers many times in the past.

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:29 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: CA/Browser Face to Face Meeting 41 Agenda – Berlin

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
On your first question - some major enterprise users would like to present their ideas and concerns about SSL certificate rules, changes, etc. from their perspective, which I know the browsers have wanted (rather than hearing it reported by the CAs who provide the certs to enterprise customers).

To be clear: Several browsers have wanted open participation. I would suggest that having CA-selected participants, without explanation (as Gerv had to seek) is perhaps detrimental to the productive dialog, in as much as it allows the Chair - and CA members - to favour particular viewpoints to the detriment of the overall ecosystem.

Might I suggest that it might not be appropriate?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170613/12f7c75f/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list