[cabfpub] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5029)
philliph at comodo.com
Tue Jun 6 15:49:07 UTC 2017
I will find out who has the change token.
In the meantime, is there anyone who has a problem with the technical proposal or the language?
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:37 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>; 'Ryan Sleevi' <sleevi at google.com>
Cc: Phillip <philliph at comodo.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5029)
On 06/06/17 16:13, Phillip via Public wrote:
> My proposal is to amend the BR to read “RFC 6844 as amended by Errata
I'm sure there would be little objection to this once the errata reaches "Held for Document Update". Is there anything that prevents it from getting there?
More information about the Public