[cabfpub] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5029)

[Phillip]

I will find out who has the change token.

In the meantime, is there anyone who has a problem with the technical proposal or the language? 


-----Original Message-----
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:37 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>; 'Ryan Sleevi' <sleevi at google.com>
Cc: Phillip <philliph at comodo.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5029)

On 06/06/17 16:13, Phillip via Public wrote:
> My proposal is to amend the BR to read “RFC 6844 as amended by Errata 
> 5029”.

I'm sure there would be little objection to this once the errata reaches "Held for Document Update". Is there anything that prevents it from getting there?

Gerv