[cabfpub] Ballot 203: Formation of Network Security Working Group

Peter Bowen pzb at amzn.com
Mon Jun 5 20:11:57 UTC 2017

> On Jun 5, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Gervase Markham via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:
> Given the short time available and the value of having the WG
> constituted by the F2F,

What is the value of having a WG established by the F2F.  The F2F can discuss the topic all it wants with or without a WG charter.  The only reason I personally see that we need a WG established is to ensure that the meeting does not count towards bylaw 2.2(g).  As long as minutes are taken, is there harm in calling this a “subgroup” of the Forum until such time there is a chartered WG?


More information about the Public mailing list