[cabfpub] Fixup ballot for CAA

[Geoff Keating]

Perhaps we should have a general rule that all RFC references mean a reference to the RFC plus all approved errata?

> On 5 Jun 2017, at 9:04 am, Phillip via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:
> 
> Implementation of CAA turned up an issue to do with the recursive treatment of pointer records. An errata has been proposed to fix the specification to achieve the processing agreed to be desirable:
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4992
> 
> I would like to propose a motion to fix this issue so that implementations use the search specified in the errata rather than the original text.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3321 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170605/d4aa2c31/attachment-0001.p7s>