[cabfpub] Fixup ballot for CAA

[Ryan Sleevi]

It looks like there has been some unaddressed feedback submitted by Jacob
Hoffman-Andrews regarding the correctness of that Errata. Has that been
resolved now? I haven't seen any acknowledgement from you on it.

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Phillip via Public <public at cabforum.org>
wrote:

> Implementation of CAA turned up an issue to do with the recursive
> treatment of pointer records. An errata has been proposed to fix the
> specification to achieve the processing agreed to be desirable:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4992
>
> I would like to propose a motion to fix this issue so that implementations
> use the search specified in the errata rather than the original text.
>
> We are separately working in IETF to revise the search procedure to make
> use of prefixed records which elides the whole issue which we could not do
> when CAA was first proposed but can now. Unfortunately, that work is
> blocked on the WG finishing its current internationalization work.
>
> Here is a rough draft of the proposed motion. Comments?
>
>
>
> Change the following in section 3.2.2.8 of the Baseline Requirements:
>
> 1) Replace the sentence:
>
> "CAs MUST process the issue, issuewild, and iodef property tags as
> specified in RFC 6844, although they are not required to act on the
> contents of the iodef property tag."
>
> With
>
> "CAs MUST process the issue, issuewild, and iodef property tags as
> specified in RFC 6844 as amended by Errata 4992, although they are not
> required to act on the contents of the iodef property tag."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170605/70c6291c/attachment-0003.html>