[cabfpub] [Ext] Fixup ballot for CAA
gerv at mozilla.org
Tue Jun 13 08:14:46 MST 2017
On 13/06/17 15:33, Phillip via Public wrote:
> I do not see a good argument for including the text in the BR and a good
> reason not to.
Well, you may not consider it a good argument, but the recommendation of
ICANN's Principal Technologist is certainly _an_ argument.
> One of the things that we have attempted to maintain is a separation of
> concerns between CABForum and IETF so that CABForum does not do protocol and
> IETF does not do policy.
Quite so. CAB Forum should not try and define what the erratum says.
This is merely a question of the best way to reference a stable piece of
More information about the Public