[cabfpub] Further unencumbered domain validation methods?
Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com
Sat Jan 14 00:12:23 UTC 2017
I would support this.
Can we wait to start a new Ballot adding back Methods 1 and 8 to BR 22.214.171.124 until we have adopted clarifying changes to our Bylaws (Ballot 183) that will apply to new ballots amending Final Guidelines (here, amending the BRs)?
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 9:51 AM
To: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>
Subject: [cabfpub] Further unencumbered domain validation methods?
I've been reviewing the IPR Exclusion Notices filed on ballot 182:
It seems that people have made claims which purport to cover the following methods in section 126.96.36.199:
2, 3, 4: Symantec:
However, ballot 182 contained the text for the following methods not included in ballot 181: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9.
This suggests that methods 1 ("Validating the Applicant as a Domain
Contact") and 8 ("IP Address") may be IP-unencumbered, and perhaps we should have a ballot to include them?
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
More information about the Public