[cabfpub] Draft CAA motion (3)

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Fri Jan 13 14:08:05 UTC 2017

Hi Bruce,

On 12/01/17 18:28, Bruce Morton wrote:
> There needs to be some consideration for existing agreements with
> Subscribers.

Is this the issue you raised in previous discussions, or a different
issue? It seems the same, but I want to make sure. If it is the same, as
noted in the comments on the new draft I'm afraid I was not convinced by
your argument.

> The effective time of 6 months may be too short. For many CAs, they will
> just start to deploy based on the new ballot. In this case with
> technical requirements which will impact the issuance of certificates,
> there should be more time allowed to ensure CAA is deployed effectively.
> I propose 12 months after the voting period ends.

I agree with Ryan that concrete data and examples are needed here.


More information about the Public mailing list