[cabfpub] Proposed Ballot 183 - Allowing 822 Names and (limited) otherNames
rob.stradling at comodo.com
Mon Jan 9 21:10:22 UTC 2017
On 09/01/17 17:39, Rich Smith via Public wrote:
> We ignore this and Ryan's arguments against, and we pass this proposal.
> Next month we decide that the various browsers all now have enough
> support for critical name constraints to update the BRs to MUST, but
> because it will break your newly authorized dual-use certs Digicert is
> now arguing against bringing the BRs back into full compliance w/RFC5280.
Would you (or anyone else from Apple) be able to provide CABForum with
data on the % of currently deployed Apple devices that support critical
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
More information about the Public