[cabfpub] Ballot 184: rfc822Names and otherNames

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Thu Jan 5 01:19:57 UTC 2017

How tied are you to allowing rfc822Name? "Reasonable measures" feels very
much like the "any equivalent method", and it also feels very much like it
will open up the gates of S/MIME, for which the GovReform is still working

For example, can you incorporate language such as / to
specify more explicitly what 'reasonable' means? Can you remove it entirely?

I'm still very uncertain about the value proposition of / and why it's desirable, at all, to use BR-compliant CAs for
that. I'm hoping you can make a compelling case here.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Jeremy Rowley via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> Thank you everyone for the feedback so far. Attached is an updated draft
> based on the comments provided. Apologies for the lack of redlining, but I
> reformatted the entire section into various permitted entries (thanks Gerv)
> which made the entire thing more readable. Let me know what you think.
> Jeremy
> * Subject Alternative Name Extension *
> Certificate Field: extensions:subjectAltName
> Required/Optional: Required
> Contents: This extension MUST contain at least one entry where each
> included entry is one of the following:
> * dNSName *
> The subjectAltName extension MAY include one or more dNSName entries
> provided each entry is either a Fully‐Qualified Domain Name or a Wildcard
> Domain Name. The CA MUST verify each Fully-Qualified Domain Name and
> Wildcard Domain Name entry in accordance with Section
> Except where the entry is an Internal Name using onion as the right‐most
> label in an entry in the subjectAltName Extension or commonName field in
> accordance with Appendix F of the EV Guidelines, a dNSName entry MUST NOT
> contain an Internal Name.
> * iPAddress*
> The subjectAltName MAY include one or more iPAddress entries provided each
> entry is an IP address verified in accordance with Section The
> entry MUST NOT contain a Reserved IP Address.
> * rfc822Name*
> The subjectAltName MAY include one or more rfc822Name entries provided
> each entry is an email address compliant with RFC5280. Prior to including
> an email address, the CA MUST take reasonable measures to verify that the
> entity submitting the request controls the email account associated with
> the email address referenced in the certificate *or* has been authorized
> by the email account holder to act on the account holder’s behalf.
> * otherName with SRVName { } type-id*
> The subjectAltName MAY include one or more SRVNames (as defined in
> RFC4986) as an otherName entry with the SRVName type-id. The CA MUST verify
> the name portion of the entry in accordance with Section SRVName
> entries MUST NOT contain Wildcard Domain Names. If a Technically
> Constrained Subordinate CA Certificate includes a dNSName constraint but
> does not have a technical constraint for SRVNames, the CA MUST NOT issue
> certificates containing SRVNames from the Technically Constrained
> Subordinate CA Certificate. A Technically Constrained Subordinate CA
> Certificate that includes a technical constraint for SRVNames MUST include
> permitted name subtrees and MAY include excluded name subtrees.
> * otherName with id-wfa-hotspot-friendlyName {
> } type-id*
> The subjectAltName MAY include one or more entries of the
> id-wfa-hotspot-friendlyName type-id. The CA MAY only include
> id-wfa-hotpost-friendlyName entries compliant with the Hotspot OSU
> Certificate Policy as officially published by the Wi-Fi Alliance at
> https://www.wi-fi.org
> <https://www.wi-fi.org/discover-wi-fi/wi-fi-certified-passpoint>. Prior
> to including a id-wfa-hotpost-friendlyName  entry, the CA MUST:
> A)      Authenticate the authority of the certificate requester in
> accordance with Section 3.2.5;
> B)      Authenticate the Subject Identity information in accordance with
> Section; and
> C)      Conduct a trademark search for the entry with the U.S. Patent and
> Trademark Office and equivalent international trademark office such as the
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170104/f115ac9e/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list