[cabfpub] Re-posting: Assign Test Certificate CAB Forum OID

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Thu Feb 16 20:46:24 UTC 2017


It doesn't look like this was ever resolved.

Would anyone be opposed to a ballot that addressed this and was circulated
before the F2F, just to get this squared away?

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
wrote:

>
> Also forwarding Erwann's reply.
> DZ.
>
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> The format of the extension needs to be defined as well. I guess a NULL
> content will be sufficient for the purpose of a test certificate.
>
> Whence, adopting the RFC5912 notation, the test extension could be defined
> as:
>
> id-cabforum OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 2 23 140 }
> id-cabf-testcertificate OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-cabforum XX YY ZZ } --
> To be defined
>
> ext-cabf-testcertificate EXTENSION ::= {
>   SYNTAX NULL IDENTIFIED BY id-cabf-testcertificate
>   CRITICALITY { TRUE }
> }
>
> Cordialement,
> Erwann Abalea
>
>
>
> On 5/9/2016 3:24 μμ, Dimitris Zacharopoulos wrote:
>
>
> Re-posting to the public list.
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [cabfman] Assign Test Certificate CAB Forum OID
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:52:30 +0000
> From: Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com> <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>
> To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr> <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
> CC: management at cabforum.org <management at cabforum.org>
> <management at cabforum.org>
>
> Public list would be appropriate as I don't see anything confidential here?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 5, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
> wrote:
>
>
> Ballot 169
> <https://cabforum.org/2016/08/05/ballot-169-revised-validation-requirements/>,
> defines:
>
> *"Test Certificate:* A Certificate with a maximum validity period of 30
> days and which i) includes a critical extension with the specified Test
> Certificate CABF OID, or ii) which chains to a root certificate not subject
> to these Requirements. "
>
> This OID is not defined yet. Does this process go through a regular
> ballot? Is it an issue for the management or the public list?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Dimitris.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Management mailing list
> Management at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing listPublic at cabforum.orghttps://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170216/d2590dfb/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Public mailing list