[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot XXX: Update Discussion Period
Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com
Fri Dec 8 18:29:33 UTC 2017
Gerv, this started as your ballot, so it's up to you - do you want to allow such minor edits without restarting the discussion period, or not?
If yes, you need to put defining / permissive language in the ballot. I won't be comfortable if we have no written permission for edits, but then allow them informally later when ballots have errors - it needs to be in the ballot.
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 1:23 PM
To: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>; Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
Cc: Virginia Fournier <vfournier at apple.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot XXX: Update Discussion Period
On 08/12/17 18:17, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:
> Just putting the question to you in the abstract – do you think we
> should have to restart a seven day discussion just to correct an
> obvious typo?
Let us say the answer to that question is "no". Then the obvious next question is: "how do you, the proponent of this idea, define 'obvious typo' in a way which does not open the door to substantive changes, or changes which people would argue about the substantiveness of, and without inventing Yet Another Voting/Polling Mechanism"?
More information about the Public