[cabfpub] Ballot 210: Misc. Changes to the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements

Moudrick M. Dadashov md at ssc.lt
Sun Aug 13 11:33:36 MST 2017


Hi Dimitris,

Sorry, I thought this ballot wasn't for BRs.

Thanks,
M.D.


On 8/13/2017 3:59 PM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos wrote:
> Hi Moudrick,
>
> As with the BRs, only 411-1 was added. I think in a previous F2F, it 
> was mentioned that some CAs that don't issue ssl/tls certificates, 
> still want to be audited against the NSRs and the previous ETSI TS 
> standards. That's why it is inclusive.
>
> IMO, adding 411-2 doesn't offer much because it is based on 411-1 
> anyway, and 411-1 describes the core CA security operations.
>
>
> DZ.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Moudrick M. Dadashov via Public" <public at cabforum.org>
> To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>, CA/Browser Forum Public 
> Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> Sent: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 6:49
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 210: Misc. Changes to the Network and 
> Certificate System Security Requirements
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> should we replace ETSI TS 101 456 and ETSI TS 102 042 with ETSI EN 319 
> 411-2 and ETSI EN 319 411-3?
> (see 
> https://cabforum.org/etsi/#Qualified-Certificates---EN-319-411-2-replaces-TS-101-456).
>
> Thanks,
> M.D.
>
> On 8/13/2017 6:30 AM, Ben Wilson via Public wrote:
>> ETSI TS 101 456
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170813/da6f5cb5/attachment.html>


More information about the Public mailing list