[cabfpub] RFC 3647 Compliance

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Wed Apr 26 08:29:59 UTC 2017

On 26/04/17 03:58, Jeremy Rowley via Public wrote:
> I agree. It shows the CA didn't accidentally delete or omit something.

And if we define the exact text to be used, there may be benefits for
automated analysis.

Having all CPs and CPSes in a standard format might also have benefits
for e.g. automated extraction of CAA identifiers, cross-CA comparisons
of validation methods, and that sort of thing.


More information about the Public mailing list